Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 31, 2013//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 31, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Robert Patterson, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12) motion for postconviction relief. Patterson argues that he is entitled to resentencing or other relief because he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. He also claims the circuit court erred by denying his motion without a hearing. We reject these arguments, and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1061 State v. Patterson

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Patterson, Robert L., pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests