Disorderly Conduct — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 30, 2013//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Disorderly Conduct — sufficiency of the evidence

William G. Bennett, a registered sex offender, appeals his conviction for disorderly conduct following a court trial and the circuit court’s denial of his postconviction motion seeking the vacation of his conviction, a new trial, and resentencing. Bennett argues that the evidence was not sufficient to prove disorderly conduct and that the use of a presentence report from an earlier conviction was improper. We disagree as to both arguments and affirm Bennett’s conviction and sentence. This opinion will not be published.

2012AP1757-CR State v. Bennett

Dist II, Walworth County, Kennedy, J., Reilly, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Turchik, Tonya, Madison; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Wiedenfeld, Zeke, Elkhorn

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event