By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 29, 2013//
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 29, 2013//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Civil
Torts — tortious interference with contract — sufficiency of the evidence
Daniel Rittenhouse appeals the judgment in his contract action against David Hulce, Ron Hulce, and Michael Begres. The case has a complex procedural history. Rittenhouse challenges several decisions or orders that resulted in the dismissal of his claims against Ron and Begres. As to Begres, we reverse and remand with directions that the original jury verdict against him be reinstated. As to Ron, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2011AP2918 Rittenhouse v. Hulce, et al.
Dist III, Brown County, Warpinski, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Ostrow, Winston A., Green Bay; Smies, Jonathan T., Green Bay; For Respondent: Curry, I. Gregg , IV, Appleton; Olivares, E. Jay, Norway, MI