Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Public Health — disability

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 16, 2013//

Public Health — disability

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 16, 2013//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Public Health — disability

Where a woman has adhesive capsulitis in both shoulders, resulting in range-of-motion problems, and degenerative rotator cuff disease in both, and can lift or carry up to 10 pounds, but only occasionally, and can not tolerate exposure to pulmonary irritants, her disability benefits were improperly denied.

“The administrative law judge decided that the applicant was capable of performing her past job as a hotel clerk and that therefore she was not disabled. The judge’s reasoning is hard to fathom. He ignored the finding by Dr. Elmes—whom, remember, he had appointed to examine the applicant, and with whom the applicant had no prior relationship—that she could lift or carry a 10-pound weight occasionally. In fact he disregarded Elmes’s entire report, on the unexplained ground that it was ‘not consistent with the medical evidence of record’ and ‘seem[ed] to be based solely on the [applicant’s] subjective complaints.’ The judge did not indicate what “medical evidence of record” he had in mind and he ignored the fact that Elmes had conducted a 90-minute examination of the applicant. He also ignored Elmes’s finding that the applicant has degenerative rotator cuff disease.”

Reversed and Remanded.

12-1873 Hughes v. Astrue

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Keys, Mag. J., Posner, J.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests