Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

Wisconsin Supreme Court


Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

Where attorney Evan M. Read did not respond to allegations that he neglected a client matter, a public reprimand is appropriate.

“Attorney Read has not filed an appeal so this matter is submitted to the court for its review pursuant to SCR 22.17(2). Although Attorney Read was given the opportunity to file an answer and present a defense to the OLR’s complaint, he has failed to do so. Accordingly, we declare him to be in default.”

2011AP1816-D OLR v. Read

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Complainant: Herman, Gregg M., Milwaukee; Weigel, William J., Madison; For Respondent: Read, Evan Morgan, pro se

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *