Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 4, 2012//

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 4, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — public reprimand

Where attorney Evan M. Read did not respond to allegations that he neglected a client matter, a public reprimand is appropriate.

“Attorney Read has not filed an appeal so this matter is submitted to the court for its review pursuant to SCR 22.17(2). Although Attorney Read was given the opportunity to file an answer and present a defense to the OLR’s complaint, he has failed to do so. Accordingly, we declare him to be in default.”

2011AP1816-D OLR v. Read

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Complainant: Herman, Gregg M., Milwaukee; Weigel, William J., Madison; For Respondent: Read, Evan Morgan, pro se

Polls

Should Wisconsin Supreme Court rules be amended so attorneys can't appeal license revocation after 5 years?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests