Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 27, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Randy Ross appeals a judgment convicting him of four crimes and an order denying his postconviction motion. Ross asserts he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm because Ross has failed to respond to the State’s arguments, see Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corporation, 90 Wis. 2d 97, 108-09, 279 N.W.2d 493 (Ct. App. 1979) (unrefuted arguments are deemed conceded), and, in any event, has not adequately developed an appellate argument, see State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627, 646, 492 N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992) (court need not address undeveloped arguments). This opinion will not be published.

2012AP358-CR State v. Ross

Dist III, Taylor County, Knox-Bauer, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Perrin, Shirlene R., Hudson; For Respondent: Larson, Sarah K., Madison; Kelz, Karl J., Medford

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event