Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 6, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 6, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Roy James Jones, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order denying his motion for postconviction relief and DNA testing pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 974.06 and 974.07 (2009-10). The circuit court concluded that Jones’s § 974.06 claims were barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). It denied Jones’s motion for DNA testing because it concluded that Jones failed to meet the standards outlined in § 974.07. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2572 State v. Jones

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Jones, Roy James, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Noet, Nancy A., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests