Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Wisconsin Court of Appeals


Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Mitchell A. Boose, pro se, appeals from a circuit court order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) motion for postconviction relief without a hearing. Boose argues that his motion should have been granted because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in four ways and his postconviction counsel provided ineffective assistance by not raising those issues in a postconviction motion as part of Boose’s direct appeal. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2050 State v. Boose

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Boose, Mitchell A., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Whelan, Maura F.J., Madison

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *