Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 18, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 18, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — plea withdrawal — ineffective assistance

Reginald Scott Williams appeals from a judgment, entered upon his pleas of no-contest, convicting him of one count of homicide by negligent use of a vehicle, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.10(1) (2009-10),[1] and one count of reckless driving causing great bodily harm, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.62(4). Williams also appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams argues that his conviction should be vacated and his pleas should be withdrawn, or alternatively, that he should be resentenced, based on trial counsel ineffectiveness and newly-discovered evidence. Williams also contends that his sentence was unduly harsh. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2011AP1379-CR State v. Williams

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Martens, J., Kessler, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Bertrand, Joy Malby, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Gansner, William L., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests