Sentencing — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 21, 2012//

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 21, 2012//

Listen to this article

Sentencing — modification

Daniel Callan appeals a judgment convicting him of child enticement and causing a child to view sexual activity. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion to modify the sentences. He argues: (1) statements he made to police should have been suppressed because he was not given his Miranda] rights even though he was in custody; (2) the sentences were unduly harsh; and (3) new factors justify a sentence reduction. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order.

Affirmed.

This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1694-CR State v. Callan

Dist. III, Outagamie County, Dyer, J., per curiam.

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Postconviction Relief-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Steven Seekamp appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of methamphetamine, as a repeater, and mai[...]

April 15, 2024

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People