Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Insurance — UM coverage — ambiguity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 14, 2012//

Insurance — UM coverage — ambiguity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 14, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Insurance — UM coverage — ambiguity

Sharon Brevik appeals a judgment declaring that Auto-Owners Insurance Company is not bound by a default judgment obtained in an Idaho action against an uninsured motorist. We conclude the insurance policy is unambiguous and requires Auto-Owners’ written consent to be bound by the judgment. Because Auto-Owners did not consent to be so bound, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1022 Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Brevik

Dist III, Forest County, Grover, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kennedy, Robert A., Jr., Crandon; For Respondent: Eckert, Michael L., Rhinelander; Strutz, Sven W., Rhinelander

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests