Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Employment — restrictive covenants

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 7, 2012//

Employment — restrictive covenants

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 7, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Employment — restrictive covenants

Key Railroad Development, LLC, appeals a summary judgment dismissing its claims against Benedetto Guido and Via Rail Logistics (collectively, Guido), and Frank Heafy. Key Railroad alleged, inter alia, that Guido and Heafy breached employee restrictive covenants. It argues the circuit court erroneously determined Key Railroad failed to produce sufficient evidence to support its claims. We agree and conclude there are material factual disputes precluding summary judgment. Further, we reject Guido’s and Heafy’s alternative arguments that the restrictive covenants were unenforceable. We therefore reverse and remand. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2073 Key Railroad Development LLC v. Guido, et al.

Dist III, Brown County, Kelley, Hammer, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Corris, Robert B., Hartland; For Respondent: Finerty, John D., Jr., Milwaukee; Crueger, Charles J., Milwaukee; Dickinson, Erin K., Milwaukee

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests