Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 31, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 31, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Stephen Klatt appeals pro se an order denying his “Motion for Resentencing.” He contends the court was bound by the terms of a plea agreement Klatt reached with the district attorney. Because we conclude the motion was procedurally barred and meritless, we affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1896 State v. Klatt

Dist III, Oconto County, Judge, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Klatt, Stephen M., pro se; For Respondent: Evans, John A., Oconto; Probst, Robert, Madison

Polls

Should additional funding and resources be given to the Secret Service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests