Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Search and Seizure — search warrants — drug detection dogs

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 24, 2012//

Search and Seizure — search warrants — drug detection dogs

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 24, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Search and Seizure — search warrants — drug detection dogs

Edison J. Busanet-Perez appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on his guilty plea, for one count of possession with intent to deliver more than forty grams of cocaine, as a party to a crime, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 961.41(1m)(cm)4. and 939.05 (2009-10). Busanet-Perez presents a single issue on appeal: he argues that the circuit court erroneously denied his suppression motion “without affording Busanet-Perez a meaningful opportunity to challenge the probable cause basis for the search warrant.” (Bolding omitted.) Specifically, he argues that the circuit court should have granted Busanet-Perez’s motion to compel the State to produce detailed records concerning a drug detection dog’s training, experience, and “alert” history. Because Busanet-Perez previously stipulated to the dog’s qualifications, we reject his argument and affirm the judgment. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1671-CR State v. Busanet-Perez

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Guolee, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Zaleski, Steven, Madison; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Noet, Nancy A., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests