Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Banking — prohibition

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 18, 2012//

Banking — prohibition

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 18, 2012//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Civil

Banking — prohibition

Where bank directors engaged in insider transactions and improper lending practices, the FDIC Board’s prohibition order was appropriate.

“We conclude that the FDIC Board properly exercised its discretion in issuing a prohibition order under § 1818(e)(7) and monetary sanctions under § 1818(i) against the Michaels for their misconduct. The Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence, its legal conclusions are reasonable, and the remedy it has imposed is rational. We therefore deny the Michaels’ petition for review.”

Petition Denied.

10-3109 Michael v. FDIC

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Tinder, J.

 

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests