Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — ex post facto clause

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 17, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — ex post facto clause

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 17, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — ex post facto clause

Elmer Keith Taylor, Jr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that his trial lawyer ineffectively represented him and that he has been subjected to ex post facto punishment. We reject these arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1434, 2011AP1435, 2011AP1436, 2011AP1437, 2011AP1438 State v. Taylor

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Taylor, Elmer Keith, Jr., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Probst, Robert, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests