Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — motion to withdraw — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 26, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — motion to withdraw — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 26, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — motion to withdraw — ineffective assistance

James Emerson appeals a judgment of conviction, entered on a jury verdict, for first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Emerson argues the circuit court erred by denying his trial counsel’s motion to withdraw, by selecting jurors from a non-racially diverse county, and by admitting other acts evidence. He also asserts that his trial counsel was ineffective in numerous ways and that he was deprived of a fair sentencing hearing because of statements made by the victim’s family. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2011AP1028-CR State v. Emerson

Dist III, Marathon County, Grau, J., Peterson, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Roberts, Scott B., Stevens Point; For Respondent: Heimerman, Kenneth J., Wausau; Sanders, Michael C., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests