Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure – discovery — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 26, 2012//

Criminal Procedure – discovery — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 26, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure – discovery — ineffective assistance

Eric Dominique Lesueur appeals the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty on seven counts of second-degree recklessly endangering safety, while armed, and possessing a firearm although a felon, see Wis. Stat. §§ 941.30(2), 939.63 & 941.29(2)(a). He also appeals the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Lesueur claims: (1) the prosecutor violated discovery orders by not giving him a CD recording of the police interview of Darrell Nicholson, Sr. (a victim and State witness) until the second day of trial; (2) his trial lawyer gave him constitutionally deficient representation by not asking for the CD recording; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by letting a State witness, Anthony Vaughn, testify that he had two prior convictions when he actually had three. We affirm. Publication in the official reports is not recommended.

2011AP1550-CR State v. Lesueur

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, Dallet, JJ., Fine, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Donovan, Christopher, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests