Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 19, 2012

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 19, 2012

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance — plea withdrawal

Daniel Newman appeals a judgment convicting him of armed robbery and burglary. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that he should be allowed to withdraw his plea because his attorney ineffectively represented him; (2) that his sentence was based on inaccurate information, violating his due process rights; and (3) that he should be resentenced because his sentence is unduly harsh and excessive. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1323-CR State v. Newman

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Hansher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Roemaat, Sara Heinemann, Waukesha; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

Should Justice Protasiewicz recuse herself on gerrymandering cases that go before the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests