Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Employment — workers compensation — cross-examination

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 11, 2012//

Employment — workers compensation — cross-examination

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 11, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Employment — workers compensation — cross-examination

Neither sec. 102.17(1)(g) nor sec. 102.17(1)(d)1 provides a party in a workers compensation action a statutory right to cross-examine an independent physician appointed by the Department of Workforce Development.

“Wis. Stat. § 907.06(1), which deals with court-appointed experts, expressly provides that the experts shall be subject to cross-examination:  . . . The judge may appoint any expert witnesses agreed upon by the parties, and may appoint witnesses of the judge’s own selection. . . . A witness so appointed shall advise the parties of the witness’s findings, if any; the witness’s deposition may be taken by any party; and the witness may be called to testify by the judge or any party. The witness shall be subject to cross-examination by each party, including a party calling the expert witness as a witness. (Emphasis added.)”

“By contrast, when the legislature drafted the subsection at issue in this case, Wis. Stat. § 102.17(1)(g), it chose to use the general term ‘rebut.’ Because it did not specify the right to cross-examination, it appears the legislature left to the Department’s discretion whether to allow cross-examination in circumstances where it might provide relevant and probative evidence.”

Affirmed.

2010AP208 Aurora Consolidated Health Care v. LIRC

Bradley, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Zitzer, Daniel L., Milwaukee; Poniewaz, Carrie May, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Harlow, R. Duane, Madison; Ward, Robert T., Waukesha

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests