Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 8, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — new trials — newly discovered evidence

Charles Edward Hennings, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that he is entitled to a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP966 State v. Hennings

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hennings, Charles Edward, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Madison

Related Content

Weekly Case Digests

Weekly Case Digests – March 21, 2022 - March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

Termination of Parental Rights

Jessica appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (TPR) to her daughter, and an order denying her [...]

March 24, 2022

Abuse of Discretion – Evidentiary Hearing

Willie Allison appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of three counts of human t[...]

March 24, 2022

Court Error – Postconviction Motion Denied

Robert C. Stryker, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child and an [...]

March 24, 2022

Divorce – Child Placement Order

Julie C. Valadez appeals from a judgment of divorce terminating her marriage to her former husband, Ricardo Va[...]

March 24, 2022

Sentence Credit

Tanya M. Liedke appeals from an order denying her motion for correction of sentence credit.

March 24, 2022

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event