Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / On Appeal / Professional Responsibility — reinstatement

Professional Responsibility — reinstatement

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Professional Responsibility — reinstatement

Where attorney Stanley V. Woodard has demonstrated the moral character to practice law, his license is reinstated with conditions.

“Although we determine that Attorney Woodard has now satisfied the criteria for reinstatement, we agree with the referee that some additional conditions on Attorney Woodard’s return to the practice of law are appropriate. We are particularly concerned about Attorney Woodard’s stated intention to practice by himself in his own law firm or in conjunction with just his wife. As the referee noted, the rules regarding the handling of client trust funds and advance fees have changed considerably in the more than 15 years that have passed since Attorney Woodard last practiced law. Moreover, much of Attorney Woodard’s misconduct involved violations of the rules governing client trust accounts and the financial side of attorney/client relationships. We are not convinced that allowing Attorney Woodard to practice by himself in his own firm with only an outside mentor attorney or with just his wife sufficiently ensures Attorney Woodard’s successful reintegration into the practice of law. Consequently, we determine that in order to ensure that Attorney Woodard does not lapse into a repetition of the misconduct that led to his suspension and revocation, his first three years of practice following reinstatement should be in a law firm or organization where he is subject to the direct supervision of another attorney. Further, in order to eliminate the temptation of merely relying on the trust that exists between spouses rather than providing direct supervision, we further direct that the supervising attorney must be someone other than Attorney Woodard’s spouse. We also agree with the referee that continuing legal education regarding fee agreements and client trust accounts is appropriate. We clarify that Attorney Woodard must complete seven (7) hours of classes dealing with those topics, as well as the subject of law office management. We also clarify the items that Attorney Woodard must disclose to the OLR.”

1993AP1135-D, 1994AP1838-D & 1996AP884-D BAPR v. Woodard

Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Complainant: Basting, Thomas J., Madison; Weigel, William J., Madison; For Respondent: Woodard, Stanley V., Madison


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*