Torts – negligence — inconsistent verdicts

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 24, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Torts – negligence — inconsistent verdicts

Richard Berg appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial after a jury concluded a car accident between Berg and Michael Lauer did not cause any injury to Berg. Berg argues the jury’s verdict is inconsistent. He also seeks a new trial in the interest of justice, arguing several of the circuit court’s evidentiary rulings were erroneous. We reject Berg’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1874 Berg v. Secura Insurance, et al.

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Stewart, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Ryberg, J. Drew, Eau Claire; Happe, Michael J., Eau Claire; For Respondent: Runde, John P., Wausau; Larson, Olga, Wausau

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event