Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — double jeopardy – mistrials — manifest necessity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 5, 2012

Criminal Procedure — double jeopardy – mistrials — manifest necessity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 5, 2012

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — double jeopardy – mistrials — manifest necessity

This is a permissive appeal from an order of the circuit court granting a mistrial, after a jury was sworn, in the face of an objection by the defendant, Levi Rodebaugh. Rodebaugh argues that the circuit court erroneously determined that a “manifest necessity” justified a mistrial and that a new trial would be permitted. I agree with Rodebaugh. Accordingly, I direct that the complaint must be dismissed with prejudice. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP2659-CR State v. Rodebaugh

Dist IV, Monroe County, Ziegler, J., Lundsten, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Walker, Bryon J., La Farge; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Croninger, Kevin D., Sparta

Polls

Should Justice Protasiewicz recuse herself on gerrymandering cases that go before the Wisconsin Supreme Court?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests