Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Robbery — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 28, 2012//

Robbery — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 28, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Robbery — sufficiency of the evidence

In these consolidated appeals, Maurice L. Bizzle appeals from judgments of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime of robbery with use of force. He further contends that he is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial was violated. Finally, he contends that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We reject Bizzle’s claims and affirm the judgments and order. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1108-CR, 2011AP1109-CR State v. Bizzle

Dist II, Racine County, Flancher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Roemaat, Sara Heinemann, Wauwatosa; For Respondent: Chiapete, W. Richard, Racine; Lloyd, Katherine Desmond, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests