Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Debtor-Creditor — supplemental proceedings

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 22, 2012//

Debtor-Creditor — supplemental proceedings

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 22, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Civil

Debtor-Creditor — supplemental proceedings

Section 816.06 does not grant a judgment creditor the right to compel a non-judgment debtor third party to testify at supplemental proceedings.

“We cannot interpret the silence of the statute to create a statutory right. Instead, we conclude that § 816.06 does not grant judgment creditors the right to compel the testimony of a non-judgment debtor third party at a supplemental proceeding. This is so because courts are not entitled to grant or expand statutory rights based solely on a statute’s silence. See Harvot, 320 Wis. 2d 1, ¶50 (holding that the courts should not undertake ‘[a]d hoc judicial discovery of implied statutory rights’); Relyea, 102 Wis. at 303-04 (holding that statutory rights ‘are entirely the subject of legislative discretion,’ not judicial discretion). Therefore, because § 816.06 confers a statutory right to examine witnesses, but does not confer as a part of that right the power to compel their testimony, we decline to infer from the statute’s silence that it grants a judgment creditor the right to compel a non-judgment debtor third party to testify at a supplemental proceeding. Were we to do so, we would legislatively create a right where the legislature chose to remain silent.”

Reversed and Remanded.

2009AP3029 Crown Castle USA, Inc., v. Orion Construction Group, LLC

Gableman, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Wagener, Nicholas Andrew, Appleton; Menghini, Michael C., Appleton; For Respondent: Moenck, Nathan, Madison; McLeod, Eric M., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests