Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — sexual assault of a child – inaccurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 21, 2012//

Sentencing — sexual assault of a child – inaccurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 21, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — sexual assault of a child – inaccurate information

Charles M. Saxon appeals from a judgment convicting him of second-degree sexual assault of a child and from the order denying his postconviction motion seeking resentencing. Saxon claims he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information, specifically, the trial court’s allegedly mistaken belief that he lacked a history of being a child sex abuse victim. That history, Saxon argues, is a mitigating factor in sentencing. We conclude that Saxon has not met his burden of proving his claim by clear and convincing evidence. We therefore affirm the judgment and order. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1296-CR State v. Saxon

Dist II, Kenosha County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Buting, Jerome F., Brookfield; For Respondent: Wellman, Sally L., Madison; Zapf, Robert D., Kenosha

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests