Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Contracts — attorney fees – contingency agreement – breach

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 21, 2012//

Contracts — attorney fees – contingency agreement – breach

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 21, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Contracts — attorney fees – contingency agreement – breach

Biersdorf & Associates, P.A., appeals and Harold M. Schmitz cross-appeals from a judgment awarding Biersdorf $421,091.05 in attorney fees and costs. Schmitz contends the award is too big. Biersdorf contends the award is too small. Based on its comprehensive findings of facts and conclusions of law, we conclude that the trial court got it just right. We affirm the judgment because the award reflects a proper exercise of discretion. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP849 In re the award of attorney fees in Harold M. Schmitz v. DOT

Dist II, Fond du Lac county, Grimm, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Biersdorf, Dan, Minneapolis; Keady, E. Kelly, Minneapolis; For Respondent: Pitz, Ian A. J., Madison

Polls

Should Hollywood and Nashville stay out of politics?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests