Sentencing — presentence credit

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — presentence credit

Daryl J. Teska appeals his judgments of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief. Teska argues that the circuit court erred by not granting him certain sentence credit on all three of his concurrent sentences for days he spent in custody presentence. Because the presentence days at issue were factually connected only with the course of conduct related to the first of Teska’s three sentences, they were not “days spent in custody in connection with the course[s] of conduct” for which the other two sentences were imposed. Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(a). The circuit court properly credited those days to only the first of Teska’s three sentences. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1010-CR, 2011AP1011-CR State v. Teska

Dist II, Walworth County, Kennedy, Reddy, JJ., Gundrum, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: German, John E., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Donohoo, Diane M., Elkhorn