Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — consecutive sentences — discretion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 13, 2012//

Sentencing — consecutive sentences — discretion

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 13, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — consecutive sentences — discretion

Demetrice R. Wright appeals from judgments of conviction, entered upon his guilty pleas, on one count of second-degree recklessly endangering safety and two counts of possession of a firearm by a felon. Wright also appeals from portions of orders denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Wright complains that his “lengthy and consecutive” sentences constitute an erroneous exercise of the sentencing court’s discretion. We disagree and affirm the judgments and orders. This opinion shall not be published.

2011AP633-CR, 2011AP634-CR State v. Wright

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, Dallet, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Loeb, Basil M., Wauwatosa; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Pray, Eileen W., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests