Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Contracts — oral contracts — acceptance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 13, 2012//

Contracts — oral contracts — acceptance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 13, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Civil

Contracts — oral contracts — acceptance

Assisted Living Concepts, Inc., appeals from a summary judgment dismissing with prejudice its claims against Siegel-Gallagher, Inc. (“SGI”), and Siegel-Gallagher Management (“Management”). Assisted Living contends that the circuit court erred in dismissing its claims for breach of contract, negligence, indemnification, and a violation of Wis. Stat. § 100.18, and that the circuit court should have pierced the corporate veil. We agree with the circuit court’s conclusion that no contract exists, a conclusion that effectively dictates the fate of the other three claims, and we agree that piercing the corporate veil was not appropriate. Therefore, we affirm the judgment. This opinion shall not be published.

2011AP363 Assisted Living Concepts Inc. v. Siegel-Gallagher Inc., et al.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cooper, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Flynn, Matthew J., Milwaukee; Long, Kevin M., Milwaukee; Schaak, John C., Milwaukee; Odekar, Vilan, Milwaukee; Hackbarth, Jonathan, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Malloy, Mark D., Milwaukee; Baish, Anthony S., Milwaukee; Schmidt, Mark, Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests