By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 14, 2012//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Sentencing — accurate information
London Teiaires Dabney, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea or modify his sentence. On appeal he argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the sentencing court failed to explain why Dabney received the same sentence as his brother despite differences in their criminal records and Dabney’s willingness to testify at his brother’s trial. He also argues that because the presentence investigation report (PSI) incorporated a while armed weapon enhancer that was dismissed, he was sentenced on the basis of an inflated recommendation and inaccurate information. We affirm the circuit court’s determination that Dabney did not present any new factors supporting sentence modification. This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Ashley, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Dabney, London Teiaires, pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee