Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing – restitution — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 7, 2012//

Sentencing – restitution — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 7, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing – restitution — modification

Andrey Aponte appeals from an order denying his motion to modify the text of a judgment of conviction that he claims does not conform to the order for restitution pronounced by the circuit court. He alternatively seeks relief from the restitution obligation on the ground that the circuit court ordered restitution without first determining his ability to pay it. Because the modification motion is groundless and the motion for relief from the restitution obligation is raised for the first time on appeal, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2628-CR State v. Aponte

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Aponte, Andrey, pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests