Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 7, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

Malcolm L. Prince appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of possessing a firearm as a felon. See Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He contends that his trial lawyer provided constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to introduce allegedly exculpatory evidence at trial. Because Prince fails to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the loss of the evidence, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1017-CR State v. Prince

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Meyeroff, Robert N., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Weber, Gregory M., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event