Sentencing — repeater enhancements

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 31, 2012//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — repeater enhancements

Christopher Holan appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of misdemeanor battery and one count of disorderly conduct, all as a repeater, and an order denying postconviction relief. He argues his admission to the prior conviction that formed the basis for the repeater enhancement was defective, and, therefore, his sentence should be commuted to the maximum penalties for the offenses without the repeater enhancer. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP1717-CR State v. Holan

Dist III, Outagamie County, Dyer, J., Hoover, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Askins, Martha K., Madison; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Schneider, Carrie A., Appleton; Maier, Andrew J., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event