Quantcast
Home / News / DA may seek rehearing in unions lawsuit (UPDATE)

DA may seek rehearing in unions lawsuit (UPDATE)

Scott Bauer
Associated Press

Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne talks to justices of the Wisconsin Supreme Court in this June file photo. Ozanne said Thursday he is considering asking the state Supreme Court to rehear a lawsuit challenging Wisconsin's law passed earlier this year effectively ending collective bargaining rights for most public workers. (AP File Photo by John Hart/Wisconsin State Journal)

Madison – The district attorney who filed a lawsuit challenging Wisconsin’s law passed earlier this year effectively ending collective bargaining rights for most public workers said Thursday he is considering asking the state Supreme Court to rehear the case.

Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne told The Associated Press he was looking at making the request after learning that Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman had received free legal services from a law firm that defended the law in that case decided in June.

Gableman was part of a four-justice majority that upheld the law, which generated massive protests in opposition earlier this year and made Wisconsin the center of the national fight over union rights.

There’s no guarantee the court would agree to grant any request to rehear the case even if Gableman did not participate in making that decision. If no other justice changed their opinion on the case, a 3-3 deadlock would be possible and it would not be heard again.

Ozanne said he didn’t have a timeline for deciding whether to make the request, but he was looking into the facts related to Gableman’s involvement with the law firm that helped defend the collective bargaining law.

Whether a rehearing is sought “depends on what all the facts are,” Ozanne said. “We have some of them, but not all.”

Gableman retained the law firm of Michael Best and Friedrich to defend him in a 2008 ethics case that related to an ad he ran in his successful campaign for the state’s highest court. Gableman signed a contingency agreement with the law firm that resulted in him paying out of pocket expenses, but required him to pay attorneys’ fees only if he prevailed and could persuade the state to pay the costs.

The Supreme Court deadlocked 3-3 on the charges Gableman violated the ethics code, which meant he did not win and could not seek reimbursement for his legal fees from the state claims board.

Michael Best also defended the state in the collective bargaining lawsuit.

Attorney Bob Jambois, who represented Democratic Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca in the collective bargaining case, said he needed to consult with Barca before deciding whether he would seek a rehearing.

Two other attorneys in that case, Roger Sage who represented Secretary of State Doug La Follette and Lester Pines who represented Democratic Senate Minority Leader Mark Miller, did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

Eric McLeod, a Michael Best attorney who represented Gableman and also assisted in the defense of the collective bargaining law, did not immediately return a call seeking comment Thursday.

Gableman has declined repeated requests to comment made through a court spokesman.

Ozanne argued in the collective bargaining case that the bill should not go into effect because a Republican-controlled committee of lawmakers broke the state’s open meetings law by voting on the bill without the required notice to the public.

But the court, in its 4-3 ruling, said legislative rules trumped the open meetings law and said passage of the bill was legal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*