Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Controlled Substances — possession of oxycodone — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 15, 2011//

Controlled Substances — possession of oxycodone — sufficiency of the evidence

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 15, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Controlled Substances — possession of oxycodone — sufficiency of the evidence

Daniel Card appeals a judgment of conviction. He argues that the evidence was insufficient because the State proved that he possessed Oxycontin, but did not prove that Oxycontin contains the prohibited substance oxycodone. We agree that the evidence was insufficient. We reverse. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP736-CR State v. Card

Dist IV, Marquette County, Wright, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Strang, Dean A., Madison; Hyland, John D., Madison; For Respondent: Freimuth, James M., Madison; Weber, Gregory M., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests