By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 15, 2011//
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 15, 2011//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Controlled Substances — possession of oxycodone — sufficiency of the evidence
Daniel Card appeals a judgment of conviction. He argues that the evidence was insufficient because the State proved that he possessed Oxycontin, but did not prove that Oxycontin contains the prohibited substance oxycodone. We agree that the evidence was insufficient. We reverse. This opinion will not be published.
Dist IV, Marquette County, Wright, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Strang, Dean A., Madison; Hyland, John D., Madison; For Respondent: Freimuth, James M., Madison; Weber, Gregory M., Madison