Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Sentencing; Modification; new factors

Sentencing; Modification; new factors

Sentencing
Modification; new factors

Michael Winius, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Winius argues he is entitled to sentence modification based on new factors, and the circuit court erred by denying his motion without a hearing. Winius also contends the circuit court erred by failing to grant his request for appointment of counsel. We reject Winius’s arguments and affirm the order.

This opinion will not be published.

2011AP265-CR State v. Winius

Dist. III, Outagamie County, Mcginnis, J., Per Curiam.

Full Text


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*