Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Opinion / Sentencing – modification — new factors

Sentencing – modification — new factors

Sentencing – modification — new factors

Mark Wieland appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of manufacture/delivery of cocaine and an order denying postconviction relief. Wieland argues a new factor warrants sentence modification. Wieland also argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its initial sentencing discretion. We reject his arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2011AP266-CR State v. Wieland

Dist III, Marinette County, Duket, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Goggin, Daniel , II, Neenah; For Respondent: Brey, Allen R., Marinette; O’Brien, Daniel J., Madison

Full Text


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*