Sentencing – modification — new factors
Mark Wieland appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of manufacture/delivery of cocaine and an order denying postconviction relief. Wieland argues a new factor warrants sentence modification. Wieland also argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its initial sentencing discretion. We reject his arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2011AP266-CR State v. Wieland
Dist III, Marinette County, Duket, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Goggin, Daniel , II, Neenah; For Respondent: Brey, Allen R., Marinette; O’Brien, Daniel J., Madison