Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 23, 2011//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 23, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Marius A. Battle, pro se, appeals from an order that denied his motion to vacate a deoxyribonucleic acid surcharge imposed at his sentencing. He contends that he is entitled to relief because his trial lawyer was constitutionally ineffective by failing to challenge the surcharge earlier in the proceedings. The claim is procedurally barred, and we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2577-CR State v. Battle

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Battle, Marius A., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Burgundy, Sarah, Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests