Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 8, 2011//

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 8, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — successive appeals

Reggie L. Townsend, pro se, appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10).[1] He argues that the circuit court misused its discretion in denying his motion for a hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We conclude that these claims are procedurally barred. See State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2338 State v. Townsend

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dallet, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Townsend, Reggie L., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Whelan, Maura F.J., Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests