Sentencing — accurate information

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 1, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — accurate information

Bernard Shaw appeals from a judgment of conviction for second-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2001-02). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Shaw argues that he was sentenced based on inaccurate information concerning the facts of the assault and that he is therefore entitled to sentence modification. We reject his argument and affirm the judgment and order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2832-CR State v. Shaw

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Martens, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Lee, Esther Cohen, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Losse, Michael J., Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event