By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 12, 2011//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Sentencing — modification
Andre M. Hicks, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues that the circuit court should modify his sentence because the circuit court relied on unreasonable and unsupported facts in sentencing him and did not adequately explain why it chose to run his sentences consecutively rather than concurrently. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Hicks, Andre M., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Madison