Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 12, 2011//

Sentencing — modification

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 12, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing — modification

Andre M. Hicks, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues that the circuit court should modify his sentence because the circuit court relied on unreasonable and unsupported facts in sentencing him and did not adequately explain why it chose to run his sentences consecutively rather than concurrently. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2270-CR State v. Hicks

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Conen, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hicks, Andre M., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests