Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 27, 2011//

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 27, 2011//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — ineffective assistance

David Michael Murrell, pro se, appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) postconviction motion without a hearing. Murrell alleged that postconviction counsel was ineffective for failing to bring three additional witnesses to a Machner hearing, where he was challenging the effectiveness of trial counsel. The circuit court ruled that even if the witnesses had been called, there was no reasonable probability of a different result at trial. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1748 State v. Murrell

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Hansher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Murrell, David Michael, pro se; For Respondent: Kassel, Jeffrey J., Madison; Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests