Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP2177-CR State v. Green

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 9, 2011//

2010AP2177-CR State v. Green

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 9, 2011//

Listen to this article

Evidence
Character for truthfulness

Kyle Green appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of repeated sexual assault of Amber J. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Green argues that the trial court erroneously allowed four witnesses to testify regarding Amber’s character for truthfulness or vouch for her credibility and his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call several witnesses to contradict Amber’s testimony regarding some details of her story. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2177-CR State v. Green

Dist III, Eau Claire County, Proctor, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Hirsch, Eileen A., Madison; For Respondent: White, Glenn R., Eau Claire; Freimuth, James M., Madison

Full Text

Polls

Should additional funding and resources be given to the Secret Service?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests