2010AP2168 In re the marriage of: Furney v. Furney

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//August 9, 2011//

Listen to this article

Family
Marital property; tax obligations

Dianne and Michael Furney were divorced on April 23, 2009, and a judgment to that effect was entered on August 20, 2009. Several months later, Dianne, proceeding pro se, filed multiple motions with the trial court, purportedly asking the court to clarify its August 20 judgment and to enforce the judgment accordingly. The trial court denied Dianne’s motions in a written order. Dianne now appeals from that order. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2010AP2168 In re the marriage of: Furney v. Furney

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Guolee, J., Brennan, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Furney, Dianne K., pro se; For Respondent: Furney, Michael J., pro se

Full Text

Family
Marital property; tax obligations
Dianne and Michael Furney were divorced on April 23, 2009, and a judgment to that effect was entered on August 20, 2009. Several months later, Dianne, proceeding pro se, filed multiple motions with the trial court, purportedly asking the court to clarify its August 20 judgment and to enforce the judgment accordingly. The trial court denied Dianne’s motions in a written order. Dianne now appeals from that order. We affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.
2010AP2168 In re the marriage of: Furney v. Furney
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Guolee, J., Brennan, J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Furney, Dianne K., pro se; For Respondent: Furney, Michael J., pro se

TAGS: WI Court of Appeals Digest, Civil Digest, Family Digest

http://www.wicourts.gov/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69171

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event