By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 20, 2011
Evidence
Relevance
Charlene S. Cortes appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against her. She argues on appeal that the circuit court erroneously precluded the defense from calling a witness and that the evidence did not support her conviction on two of nineteen charges. We conclude that the court did not err when it excluded the evidence and that the State presented sufficient evidence on all of the charges. Affirmed. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP680-CR State v. Cortes
Dist. II, Kenosha County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam.
Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Katherine Desmond Lloyd, Madison; For Defendant: Joseph L. Sommers