Jovan Dukic appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdict, on one count of stalking a victim under the age of eighteen. Dukic contends the trial court erred by not conducting a proper colloquy when he asked to represent himself at trial, and he argues that multiple erroneous evidentiary rulings had a cumulatively prejudicial impact.
We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment.
Affirmed. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP1899-CR State v. Dukic
Dist. I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam.
Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Sally L. Wellman, Madison; For Defendant: Michael S. Holzman, Waukesha