Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP1899-CR State v. Dukic

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 19, 2011//

2010AP1899-CR State v. Dukic

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 19, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Self-representation

Jovan Dukic appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered upon a jury’s verdict, on one count of stalking a victim under the age of eighteen.  Dukic contends the trial court erred by not conducting a proper colloquy when he asked to represent himself at trial, and he argues that multiple erroneous evidentiary rulings had a cumulatively prejudicial impact.

We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment.

Affirmed. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1899-CR State v. Dukic

Dist. I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam.

Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Sally L. Wellman, Madison; For Defendant: Michael S. Holzman, Waukesha

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests