2008AP2527 In re the marriage of: Yang v. Yang

Listen to this article

Family
Waste

Kachi Yang appeals the order supplementing the trial court’s judgment of divorce granted earlier to Kachi and her former husband, Dao Yang. Kachi argues the trial court erred in determining that Dao did not commit waste when he sold a half interest in twenty acres of farmland for $50,000 or when he withdrew $171,000 over the course of several years from a Landmark Credit Union account. She also contends the trial court erred in not finding that all of Dao’s trips to Laos constituted waste. Because the trial court’s findings of fact were not clearly erroneous and the trial court did not err in determining that, with the exception of monies spent by Dao on three trips, Dao’s actions did not constitute waste, we affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2008AP2527 In re the marriage of: Yang v. Yang

Dist I, Milwaukee County, White, J., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Anderegg, Rex, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Carson, Christopher S., New Berlin

Full Text