Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 2009AP1212 & 2010AP491 Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.

2009AP1212 & 2010AP491 Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.

Torts Equitable indemnification All sums that a defendant paid to settle a tort case are involuntary and subject to reimbursement. “Excel invokes the principle that a mere volunteer may not get equitable indemnity. See Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co. v. Priewe, 118 Wis. 2d 318, 323, 348 N.W.2d 585, 587 (Ct. App. 1984) (‘“Indemnification shifts the entire loss from ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*